S Green
June 10th 04, 11:12 PM
"Scott M. Kozel" > wrote in message
om...
> Rich Ahrens > wrote:
> >
> > Peter Duniho wrote:
> > > "Scott M. Kozel" > wrote
> > >>
> > >>> Kerosene is the American word for paraffin - they are the same
stuff.
> > >>> Jets still run on it.
> > >>
> > >>Actually the reverse is true - 'paraffin' is the British word for what
> > >>Americans call 'kerosene'.
> > >
> > > Huh? What's the difference?
> > >
> > > Seems to me you're arguing something like whether "moi" is the French
word
> > > for "me" or "me" is the English word for "moi".
> > >
> > > Or did you not notice that the person to whom you were disagreeing was
from
> > > the UK neighborhood of the English-speaking world?
> >
> > You're forgetting that Scott believes everything on Usenet should be
> > posted from a U.S. perspective.
>
> I had already privately predicted that there would be a 'drivel'
> response from Rich Ahrens. I have already clearly posted that I was
> posting on behalf of both the U.S. and the U.K., and anyone who would
> benefit from a clear definition of the two terms.
No need to reply on behalf of the UK you bumptious little ****
om...
> Rich Ahrens > wrote:
> >
> > Peter Duniho wrote:
> > > "Scott M. Kozel" > wrote
> > >>
> > >>> Kerosene is the American word for paraffin - they are the same
stuff.
> > >>> Jets still run on it.
> > >>
> > >>Actually the reverse is true - 'paraffin' is the British word for what
> > >>Americans call 'kerosene'.
> > >
> > > Huh? What's the difference?
> > >
> > > Seems to me you're arguing something like whether "moi" is the French
word
> > > for "me" or "me" is the English word for "moi".
> > >
> > > Or did you not notice that the person to whom you were disagreeing was
from
> > > the UK neighborhood of the English-speaking world?
> >
> > You're forgetting that Scott believes everything on Usenet should be
> > posted from a U.S. perspective.
>
> I had already privately predicted that there would be a 'drivel'
> response from Rich Ahrens. I have already clearly posted that I was
> posting on behalf of both the U.S. and the U.K., and anyone who would
> benefit from a clear definition of the two terms.
No need to reply on behalf of the UK you bumptious little ****